[Greeneon]

Originally Posted by uzzo2

ok, thank you sir, i don't know about becoming a major player in anything. i don't make that much money, but it's evident to me that this country needs a better way. we can't sustain ourselves at $120.00 barrel oil, i'm assuming when you say limit order you mean only purchase a certain number of shares. i think with optionxpress you get up to nine trades per quarter @$14.95 per trade and after nine trades you get it for $9.95 per trade, i also think there's a fee assessed with stocks that are less than $2.00. i was just going to try to buy 1000 shares a week until i hit my 9 or 10 trades and then just see what it does. i'm actually thinking of buying some of both, usse and sstp

I actually meant for SSTP potentially becoming a major player! ...not a bad idea to diversify between USSE & SSTP...

[kingPink]

Greenpower

Thank you for the video. I am curious with all the debate about if you were Mr. Rivera and then you have denied it and posted a disclaimer as signature. But obviously you seem to know more than usual investor. Is it fair to assume that are not related to USSE/SSTP but you might be related to Mr. Rivera. I will appreciate if you can clarify this. It helps to know if the poster should be taken seriously or not.

[grantg2]

uzzo2... "i'm assuming when you say limit order you mean only purchase a certain number of shares"

Obviously you are very new and need to BE WARNED that PINK SHEET stocks are very risky... although this has had the crap beat out of it and can only go a short way to ZERO worst case.

That said, no... you did not grasp the meaning of "limit order" that means when you place an order for the shares of USSE or SSTP in addition to specifying the NUMBER OF SHARES... you place the order as a "limit order" in which you specify the maximum price (amount) per share you are willing to pay... so that the unscrupulous MARKET Makers/MANIPULATORS known as MMs... do not steal your money by inflating the cost to you.

Example... SSTP closed Friday at .036/share... if you were to place a "market order" on Monday without specifying the maximum PPS...

"Buy 10,000 SSTP" You might get them and find you PAID .04/share and immediately after that the MMs might show it as a bid of .031 and an ASK of .033. Nonetheless, you will have way overpaid for it.

So if you want it, and will only pay .036 for it... you need to use a limit order:

"BUY 10,000 SSTP at a limit .036"

That means you will NOT pay more than that & just might get it for less.

I strongly urge you to begin reading ALL the available educational material on stock trading on the broker website that you can find... and you might want to check on some other websites offering the basics.

If you wish to GAMBLE a bit on USSE/SSTP that is your choice... just do NOT risk more than you can afford to lose. Some have already done that in this stock & it has been a downward rollercoaster ride to here. I think better days are ahead... but it still could go bust!

GLTY

[uzzo2]

Originally Posted by grantg2

uzzo2... "i'm assuming when you say limit order you mean only purchase a certain number of shares"

Obviously you are very new and need to BE WARNED that PINK SHEET stocks are very risky... although this has had the crap beat out of it and can only go a short way to ZERO worst case.

That said, no... you did not grasp the meaning of "limit order" that means when you place an order for the shares of USSE or SSTP in addition to specifying the NUMBER OF SHARES... you place the order as a "limit order" in which you specify the maximum price (amount) per share you are willing to pay... so that the unscrupulous MARKET Makers/MANIPULATORS known as MMs... do not steal your money by inflating the cost to you.

Example... SSTP closed Friday at .036/share... if you were to place a "market order" on Monday without specifying the maximum PPS...

"Buy 10,000 SSTP" You might get them and find you PAID .04/share and immediately after that the MMs might show it as a bid of .031 and an ASK of .033. Nonetheless, you will have way overpaid for it.

So if you want it, and will only pay .036 for it... you need to use a limit order:

"BUY 10,000 SSTP at a limit .036"

That means you will NOT pay more than that & just might get it for less.

I strongly urge you to begin reading ALL the available educational material on stock trading on the broker website that you can find... and you might want to check on some other websites offering the basics.

If you wish to GAMBLE a bit on USSE/SSTP that is your choice... just do NOT risk more than you can afford to lose. Some have already done that in this stock & it has been a downward rollercoaster ride to here. I think better days are ahead... but it still could go bust!

GLTY

ok, thanks for the clarification, i'm not going to put out more than 300-400 bucks. that should buy around 10000 shares, i seen somewhere someone was speculating this thing getting into full bloom and $15 dollars a share. wouldn't that be sweet? 150k on a 400 dollar investment, if i do buy it'll be for long term.

[2doubledown]

Ron, don't post on your site but found this new edition to the Green Consortium website:

Baytown Energy Consortium has "locked-up" an unlimited supply of Palm Waste from its subsidiaries in Central America and Asia, Oil Palm Fronds are the waste products left after the palm fruit has been removed. Oil Palm Fronds are high in oil and fiber.

Please explain further "locked up" and what this means to producing fuel at Baytown????

Will check your comments at your site......thanks for all the work !!!

[ParsonMac]

Originally Posted by Greeneon

Just keep in mind, Big Oil has made trillions over the years and they want to hold on to their stranglehold on the world's energy dependance as long as they can (for example Exxon Mobil alone made over $300 Billion in revenues over the past year). When they see alternatives such as this, which is both sustainable and better for the environment, they become threatened and perhaps take measures to do all they can to try and stop it. This is all in my own opinion of course...

Good Luck!

I have a little different view. I'm sure the Oil Companies will want to maintain profits, but there is such demand for their product and we will be so dependent upon them for years to come, and alternative energies will come online so gradually/incrementally (and slowly), that it's not going to make that big a dent (esp. with oil so high!)

As other technologies become viable (like Vertroleum) I'm sure Big Oil will diversify to reap those profits as well.

The neat thing about Vertroleum and related products is that the current petroleum infrastructure in place nation wide (and which is not going to change overnight) can be used without modifications (or little).

I like and appreciate what Oil and hard-working oil workers and companies have done for our country. We wouldn't be where we are without them (though they COULD stand) to give us a price break and refuse to let the futures traders have as much influence as they do!)

But... what do I know?

[ParsonMac]

Originally Posted by 2doubledown

Ron, don't post on your site but found this new edition to the Green Consortium website:

Baytown Energy Consortium has "locked-up" an unlimited supply of Palm Waste from its subsidiaries in Central America and Asia, Oil Palm Fronds are the waste products left after the palm fruit has been removed. Oil Palm Fronds are high in oil and fiber.

Please explain further "locked up" and what this means to producing fuel at Baytown????

Will check your comments at your site......thanks for all the work !!!

They've SECURED the suppliers for Palm Waste Feedstock for Rivera's Reactors.

If you go back a few pages here on KaBoom, you'll find a Wikipedia article posted on Palm Oil and Waste. The tonnage of waste leftover after processing palm oil is IMMENSE... in Malaysia/Indonesia, they've got 'mountain ranges' of the stuff and have to burn it just to get rid of it.

But to 'secure' a supply at rock-bottom prices (or 'next to nothing') before it's common knowledge that it can be used with our process, makes good business sense. Once palm oil producers realize there's a market for their waste, they'll start charging for it...

Best to secure or lock up as much freebie or super cheapie feedstock as possible before palm oil producers use it for another revenue stream...

[Greeneon]

Originally Posted by ParsonMac

I have a little different view. I'm sure the Oil Companies will want to maintain profits, but there is such demand for their product and we will be so dependent upon them for years to come, and alternative energies will come online so gradually/incrementally (and slowly), that it's not going to make that big a dent (esp. with oil so high!)

As other technologies become viable (like Vertroleum) I'm sure Big Oil will diversify to reap those profits as well.

The neat thing about Vertroleum and related products is that the current petroleum infrastructure in place nation wide (and which is not going to change overnight) can be used without modifications (or little).

I like and appreciate what Oil and hard-working oil workers and companies have done for our country. We wouldn't be where we are without them (though they COULD stand) to give us a price break and refuse to let the futures traders have as much influence as they do!)

But... what do I know?

I agree that the oil industry has created thousands of jobs and has done much for our country; however I am thinking more of the source of a majority of the oil consumed - the middle east. Our dependance on that region needs to be lowered and a fundamental shift to more consumption of renewable/green energy will do that. No doubt the oil companies will still make their money in the distribution of oil; but hopefully they will gradually move towards the distribution of renewable sources of which they will no doubt be a part of as well. We all know this will happen...it's just when and at who's cost...and more importantly who's benefit (hopefully SSTP will play a part in that!). The reference to XOM's revenues ($300B+/yr) tells us the mass amount of potential in this eventual energy revolution...

JMHO...

[ParsonMac]

Originally Posted by Greeneon

I agree that the oil industry has created thousands of jobs and has done much for our country; however I am thinking more of the source of a majority of the oil consumed - the middle east. Our dependance on that region needs to be lowered and a fundamental shift to more consumption of renewable/green energy will do that. No doubt the oil companies will still make their money in the distribution of oil; but hopefully they will gradually move towards the distribution of renewable sources of which they will no doubt be a part of as well. We all know this will happen...it's just when and at who's cost...and more importantly who's benefit (hopefully SSTP will play a part in that!). The reference to XOM's revenues ($300B+/yr) tells us the mass amount of potential in this eventual energy revolution...

JMHO...

I think our dependence on foreign oil should be COMPLETELY ELIMINATED in the next five years. We could easily do it if we wanted it and our "leaders" would view it as part of our national security. The oil in Anwar, the Dakotas, all of our coal, the Pacific coast, the Gulf could and should all be tapped as well as green alternatives (that don't include food sources) and other new technologies. A holistic approach as it were. And with all of our clean air technologies we don't have to worry a smidge about it. Put a bunch of our people back to work exploring, drilling, and building new refineries...

Does anyone remember how long it took to build things like the San Francisco Bay Bridge, the Golden Gate, Hoover Dam? We could be completely out of our energy crisis and paying for cheap energy in just a couple of years if Washington had a lick of common sense!

I'm all for good stewardship of the environment and conservation, but the EXTREMISM of the current state of 'environmentalism' is just one more subversive thorn in America's side.



Woke up cranky this morning... WHERE'S MY COFFEE ?!?

[TheSeer]

"The neat thing about Vertroleum and related products is that the current petroleum infrastructure in place nation wide (and which is not going to change overnight) can be used without modifications (or little)."

You hit the nail on the head with that statement parson! The infrstructure to distribute the fuel is key. The key is PROFIT. When the majors see the profit margin is greater with vertroleum than petroleum.....they will shift.